Change type of recreational fishing gear (e.g. hook type, bait, lure size)

  • Overall effectiveness category Evidence not assessed

  • Number of studies: 2

How is the evidence assessed?
  • Effectiveness
    not assessed
  • Certainty
    not assessed
  • Harms
    not assessed

Study locations

Key messages

  • Two studies evaluated the effects of changing the type of hook used on recreational fishing gear on anguillid eels. One study was in Norway and one was in Germany. 

COMMUNITY RESPONSE (0 STUDIES) 

 

POPULATION RESPONSE (2 STUDIES) 

  • Survival (2 studies): One of two replicated, controlled studies in Norway and Germany reported that fishing with small J-hooks led to fewer deaths of released European eels compared to large J-hooks. The other study found no difference in the survival of released European eels caught on small or large hooks with or without barbs. 
  • Condition (1 study): One replicated, controlled study in Norway found that small fishing hooks were less likely to be retained by released European eels than large hooks. 

BEHAVIOUR (0 STUDIES) 

About key messages

Key messages provide a descriptive index to studies we have found that test this intervention.

Studies are not directly comparable or of equal value. When making decisions based on this evidence, you should consider factors such as study size, study design, reported metrics and relevance of the study to your situation, rather than simply counting the number of studies that support a particular interpretation.

Supporting evidence from individual studies

  1. A replicated, controlled study in 2014 in a lake in Hordaland, Norway (Weltersbach et al. 2018) found that using small hooks for recreational fishing of European eels Anguilla anguilla led to higher hook-shedding rates compared to large hooks, but survival rates were similar for eels caught on small and large hooks with and without barbs. Seven of 17 captured eels (41%) shed small hooks after release, whereas none of 15 eels (0%) shed large hooks. After five months, the percentage of released eels that survived did not differ significantly between those caught on large barbed (5 of 10 eels, 50%), large barbless (3 of 5 eels, 60%), small barbed (8 of 11 eels, 73%) or small barbless hooks (3 of 6 eels, 50%). In May 2014, thirty-two European eels (31–50 cm long) were caught by rod and line from a lake shoreline at night. Large (10-mm gap width) and small hooks (6.8-mm gap width) with and without barbs were attached to 7-kg monofilament line and baited with 1–2 live earthworms Eisenia hortensis. All captured eels were hooked beyond the mouth cavity (‘deep-hooked’), and the line cut as close to the mouth as possible. Eels were transported to a research facility where they were anaesthetized, measured, tagged and x-rayed before being transferred to a holding tank. Eels were fed and checked daily for 23 weeks, and x-rayed 1, 3, 10, 24, 54, 115 and 163 days after capture. 

    Study and other actions tested
  2. A replicated, controlled study in 2015 in two ponds in Germany (Weltersbach et al. 2018) reported that using small J-hooks for recreational fishing led to fewer deaths of European eel Anguilla anguilla after catch and release than large J-hooks. Unless stated, Results are not based on tests of statistical significance. Up to 65 days after release, 21 of 53 eels (40%) died after fishing with a small J-hook, compared to 31 of 57 (54%) with a large J-hook. Meanwhile, 12 of 38 eels (32%) died after being caught in a fyke net. Fishers caught significantly more eels with small J-hooks (242 eels, 0.17 eels/hour) than large J-hooks (150 eels, 0.1 eels/hour). In May–June 2015, two drainable fishing ponds (roughly 41 x 9 x 1.5 m) were each stocked with 153 wild yellow eels (36–63 cm length) caught from nearby lakes. In JuneJuly 2015, eels were fished from the shoreline of each pond at night on 16 occasions. Small (34.6 x 11.4 mm) and large J-hooks (20.8 x 7.0 mm) were attached to a 50 cm line and baited with 1–3 live earthworms Eisenia hortensis or Lumbricus terrestris. As a comparison, eels were simultaneously caught in one fyke net/pond. After catching, hooks were removed or the line cut as close to the mouth as possible. Eels were held in rectangular nets for 72 h, and then monitored daily in a holding pond for 43–65 days, after which the pond was drained and searched. Eels not recovered from the ponds were assumed to have died. Eel catch rates with small and large J-hooks were assessed by 67 fishers in a citizen science project in June–October 2015.

    Study and other actions tested
Please cite as:

Cutts V., Berthinussen A., Reynolds S.A., Clarhäll A., Land M., Smith R.K. & Sutherland W.J. (2024) Eel Conservation in Inland Habitats: Global evidence for the effects of actions to conserve anguillid eels. Conservation Evidence Series Synopses. University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Where has this evidence come from?

List of journals searched by synopsis

All the journals searched for all synopses

Eel Conservation in Inland Habitats

This Action forms part of the Action Synopsis:

Eel Conservation in Inland Habitats
What Works 2021 cover

What Works in Conservation

What Works in Conservation provides expert assessments of the effectiveness of actions, based on summarised evidence, in synopses. Subjects covered so far include amphibians, birds, mammals, forests, peatland and control of freshwater invasive species. More are in progress.

More about What Works in Conservation

Download free PDF or purchase
The Conservation Evidence Journal

The Conservation Evidence Journal

An online, free to publish in, open-access journal publishing results from research and projects that test the effectiveness of conservation actions.

Read the latest volume: Volume 22

Go to the CE Journal

Discover more on our blog

Our blog contains the latest news and updates from the Conservation Evidence team, the Conservation Evidence Journal, and our global partners in evidence-based conservation.


Who uses Conservation Evidence?

Meet some of the Evidence Champions

Endangered Landscape ProgrammeRed List Champion - Arc Kent Wildlife Trust The Rufford Foundation Mauritian Wildlife Supporting Conservation Leaders
Sustainability Dashboard National Biodiversity Network Frog Life The international journey of Conservation - Oryx Cool Farm Alliance UNEP AWFA Bat Conservation InternationalPeople trust for endangered species Vincet Wildlife Trust