Alter cage size
Overall effectiveness category Awaiting assessment
Number of studies: 1
View assessment score
Hide assessment score
How is the evidence assessed?
Effectiveness
not assessedCertainty
not assessedHarms
not assessed
Supporting evidence from individual studies
In 2000, a replicated study in Tasmania, Australia (Douglas- Helders et al., 2004) found higher levels of amoebic gill disease salmon, Salmo salar, stocked in 60m diameter round cages compared to those in 80m diameter cages. Levels of amoebic gill disease were 47% and 22%, respectively. Two cages with a diameter of 60m and three of 80m diameter were used for the study. Average biomass per pen was 2337 kg for the 60m cages and 2806 kg for the 80m cages. Monthly samples were taken from August to November. Signs of clinical disease were assessed using the routine Tasmanian salmon farmers gill assessment method.
Study and other actions tested
Where has this evidence come from?
List of journals searched by synopsis
All the journals searched for all synopses
This Action forms part of the Action Synopsis:
Sustainable Aquaculture
Sustainable Aquaculture - Published 2013
Atlantic salmon Aquaculture Synopsis