Actions to conserve biodiversity
We have summarised evidence from the scientific literature about the effects of actions to conserve wildlife and ecosystems.
Review the evidence from the studies
Not sure what Actions are? Read a brief description.
23 Actions found
Refine
Hide
23 Actions found
Download Actions
Order results by:
Action | Effectiveness | Studies | Category | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Thin trees within forest Action Link | Likely to be beneficial | 12 | ||
Use selective harvesting instead of clearcutting Action Link | Likely to be beneficial | 8 | ||
Clear or open patches in forests Action Link | Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 4 | ||
Use patch retention harvesting instead of clearcutting Action Link | Likely to be beneficial | 3 | ||
Remove competing vegetation to allow tree establishment in clearcut areas Action Link | Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 3 | ||
Leave coarse woody debris in forests Action Link | Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 3 | ||
Fell trees in groups, leaving surrounding forest unharvested Action Link | Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 3 | ||
Apply fertilizer to trees Action Link | Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 3 | ||
Retain undisturbed patches during thinning operations Action Link | Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 2 | ||
Retain wildlife corridors in logged areas Action Link | Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 2 | ||
Gather coarse woody debris into piles after felling Action Link | Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 2 | ||
Provide supplementary feed to reduce tree damage Action Link | Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 1 | ||
Plant trees following clearfelling Action Link | Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 1 | ||
Allow forest to regenerate naturally following logging Action Link | Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 1 | ||
Retain dead trees after uprooting Action Link | Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 1 | ||
Use thinning of forest instead of clearcutting Action Link | Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 1 | ||
Retain understorey vegetation within plantations Action Link | Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 1 | ||
Leave standing deadwood/snags in forests Action Link | Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 1 | ||
Use tree tubes/small fences/cages to protect individual trees Action Link | No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 | ||
Control firewood collection in remnant native forest and woodland Action Link | No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 | ||
Harvest timber outside mammal reproduction period Action Link | No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 | ||
Coppice trees Action Link | No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 | ||
Retain riparian buffer strips during timber harvest Action Link | No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 |
Download Actions
Watch this search
If you are familiar with RSS feeds, please click the button below to retrieve the feed URL:
RSS feed for this searchIf you are unfamiliar with RSS feeds, we would suggest reading this BBC article.
Unfortunately, due to the number of feeds we have available, we cannot provide e-mail updates. However, you could use tools such as Feed My Inbox to do this for you.
What are 'Individual studies' and 'Actions'?
Individual studies
An individual study is a summary of a specific scientific study, usually taken from a scientific journal, but also from other resources such as reports. It tells you the background context, the action(s) taken and their consequences.
If you want more detail please look at the original reference.
Actions
Each action page focuses on a particular action you could take to benefit wildlife or ecosystems.
It contains brief (150-200 word) descriptions of relevant studies (context, action(s) taken and their consequences) and one or more key messages.
Key messages show the extent and main conclusions of the available evidence. Using links within key messages, you can look at the paragraphs describing each study to get more detail. Each paragraph allows you to assess the quality of the evidence and how relevant it is to your situation.
Where we found no evidence, we have been unable to assess whether or not an intervention is effective or has any harmful impacts.