Actions to conserve biodiversity
We have summarised evidence from the scientific literature about the effects of actions to conserve wildlife and ecosystems.
Review the evidence from the studies
Not sure what Actions are? Read a brief description.
294 Actions found
Refine
Hide
294 Actions found
Download Actions
Order results by:
Action | Effectiveness | Studies | Category | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Provide diversionary feeding for mammals to reduce nuisance behaviour and human-wildlife conflict Action Link | Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 3 | ||
Protect mammals close to development areas (e.g. by fencing) Action Link | No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 | ||
Use signs or access restrictions to reduce disturbance to mammals Action Link | Likely to be beneficial | 1 | ||
Keep cats indoors or in outside runs to reduce predation of wild mammals Action Link | Likely to be beneficial | 1 | ||
Set minimum distances for approaching mammals Action Link | No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 | ||
Set maximum number of people/vehicles approaching mammals Action Link | No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 | ||
Exclude or limit number of visitors to reserves or protected areas Action Link | Beneficial | 5 | ||
Use collar-mounted devices to reduce predation by domestic animals Action Link | Beneficial | 5 | ||
Keep dogs indoors or in outside enclosures to reduce threats to wild mammals Action Link | No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 | ||
Keep domestic cats and dogs well-fed to reduce predation of wild mammals Action Link | No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 | ||
Translocate problem mammals away from residential areas (e.g. habituated bears) to reduce human-wildlife conflict Action Link | Likely to be ineffective or harmful | 11 | ||
Provide paths to limit extent of disturbance to mammals Action Link | No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 | ||
Use voluntary agreements with locals to reduce disturbance Action Link | No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 | ||
Habituate mammals to visitors Action Link | Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 1 | ||
Translocate mammals that have habituated to humans (e.g. bears) Action Link | Trade-off between benefit and harms | 2 | ||
Treat mammals to reduce conflict caused by disease transmission to humans Action Link | Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 1 | ||
Place orphaned or abandoned wild young with wild foster parents Action Link | Likely to be beneficial | 3 | ||
Issue enforcement notices to deter use of non bear-proof garbage dumpsters to reduce human-wildlife conflict Action Link | Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 1 | ||
Prevent mammals accessing potential wildlife food sources or denning sites to reduce nuisance behaviour and human-wildlife conflict Action Link | Likely to be beneficial | 2 | ||
Scare or otherwise deter mammals from human-occupied areas to reduce human-wildlife conflict Action Link | Likely to be beneficial | 10 | ||
Cease/reduce payments to cull mammals Action Link | Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 1 | ||
Temporarily hold females and offspring in fenced area to increase survival of young Action Link | No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 | ||
Rehabilitate injured, sick or weak mammals Action Link | Likely to be beneficial | 13 | ||
Retain wildlife corridors in residential areas Action Link | Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 1 | ||
Install underpasses beneath ski runs Action Link | Unknown effectiveness (limited evidence) | 1 |
Download Actions
Terrestrial Mammal Conservation - Published 2020
Terrestrial Mammal Conservation
Watch this search
If you are familiar with RSS feeds, please click the button below to retrieve the feed URL:
RSS feed for this searchIf you are unfamiliar with RSS feeds, we would suggest reading this BBC article.
Unfortunately, due to the number of feeds we have available, we cannot provide e-mail updates. However, you could use tools such as Feed My Inbox to do this for you.
What are 'Individual studies' and 'Actions'?
Individual studies
An individual study is a summary of a specific scientific study, usually taken from a scientific journal, but also from other resources such as reports. It tells you the background context, the action(s) taken and their consequences.
If you want more detail please look at the original reference.
Actions
Each action page focuses on a particular action you could take to benefit wildlife or ecosystems.
It contains brief (150-200 word) descriptions of relevant studies (context, action(s) taken and their consequences) and one or more key messages.
Key messages show the extent and main conclusions of the available evidence. Using links within key messages, you can look at the paragraphs describing each study to get more detail. Each paragraph allows you to assess the quality of the evidence and how relevant it is to your situation.
Where we found no evidence, we have been unable to assess whether or not an intervention is effective or has any harmful impacts.