Captive breeding and reintroduction evaluation criteria: a case study of peninsular bighorn sheep
Published source details Ostermann S.D., Deforge J.R. & Edge W.D. (2001) Captive breeding and reintroduction evaluation criteria: a case study of peninsular bighorn sheep. Conservation Biology, 15, 749-760.
Actions
This study is summarised as evidence for the following.
Action | Category | |
---|---|---|
Release translocated/captive-bred mammals in family/social groups Action Link |
Release translocated/captive-bred mammals in family/social groups
A study in 1985–1998 in a shrub-dominated mountain area in California, USA (Ostermann et al. 2001) found that captive-reared bighorn sheep Ovis canadensis released into the wild in groups had similar survival and population recruitment rates compared to wild-reared sheep, but the overall population declined over 14 years. Captive-reared released and wild-reared bighorn sheep had similar average annual survival (captive-reared: 80%; wild-reared: 81%) and recruitment rates (captive-reared: 0.14 lambs/adult female; wild-reared: 0.14 lambs/adult female). However, despite releases, the overall population at the study site declined over 14 years from an estimated 40 sheep in 1985 to 22 sheep in 1998. In 1985–1998, seventy-four captive-reared bighorn sheep were released at three sites in a 70-km2 area. Captive-reared sheep included 49 captive-born and 25 wild-born lambs brought into captivity at 1–5 months of age. Captive-reared sheep were released in 33 groups of 1–6 animals, mostly when one year old. Water was provided at the release site for 3–20 days post-release. Released sheep were ear-tagged and radio-collared and monitored at least once/week during each of 14 years in 1985–1998. Survival and reproduction were compared with those of 43 wild-reared sheep radio-tracked in the study area during the same time period.
(Summarised by: Ricardo Rocha)