Actions to conserve biodiversity
We have summarised evidence from the scientific literature about the effects of actions to conserve wildlife and ecosystems.
Review the evidence from the studies
Not sure what Actions are? Read a brief description.
126 Actions found
Refine
Hide
126 Actions found
Download Actions
Order results by:
Action | Effectiveness | Studies | Category | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Add lime to water bodies to reduce acidification Action Link | Evidence not assessed | 1 | ![]() | |
Add nitrogen and phosphorus to nutrient-limited rivers Action Link | No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 | ![]() | |
Aerate waterways to increase dissolved oxygen Action Link | No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 | ![]() | |
Breed eels in captivity Action Link | Evidence not assessed | 9 | ![]() | |
Capture and transport eels around dams/barriers (‘trap and transport’) Action Link | Evidence not assessed | 4 | ![]() | |
Cease or prohibit anchoring Action Link | Evidence not assessed | 0 | ![]() | |
Cease or prohibit renewable energy installations in an area Action Link | No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 | ![]() | |
Change capture, transport or release methods to increase survivorship of translocated (‘stocked’ or ‘restocked') eels Action Link | Evidence not assessed | 3 | ![]() | |
Change type of recreational fishing gear (e.g. hook type, bait, lure size) Action Link | Evidence not assessed | 2 | ![]() | |
Clear bankside vegetation Action Link | Evidence not assessed | 1 | ![]() | |
Create artificial habitat structures (e.g. floating islands) Action Link | No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 | ![]() | |
Create or restore backwater habitats Action Link | Evidence not assessed | 1 | ![]() | |
Create or restore meanders to straightened rivers Action Link | Evidence not assessed | 1 | ![]() | |
Create or restore pool and riffle sequences Action Link | No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 | ![]() | |
Create or restore step and pool sequences Action Link | No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 | ![]() | |
Create or restore wetlands Action Link | No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 | ![]() | |
Decontaminate equipment to prevent spread of disease, invasive or problematic species Action Link | No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 | ![]() | |
Discourage commercial harvest during periods of elevated temperatures Action Link | No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 | ![]() | |
Divert shipping routes Action Link | Evidence not assessed | 0 | ![]() | |
Enforce existing legislation for habitat protection Action Link | No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 | ![]() | |
Enforce regulations to prevent trafficking and trade of eels Action Link | No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 | ![]() | |
Engage local communities in conservation activities Action Link | No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 | ![]() | |
Engage policy makers to make policy changes beneficial to eels Action Link | No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 | ![]() | |
Establish mutually acceptable management regulations (e.g. harvest levels) with local community fishers Action Link | No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 | ![]() | |
Establish open and transparent reporting of fishing effort data Action Link | No evidence found (no assessment) | 0 | ![]() |
Download Actions
Eel Conservation in Inland Habitats - Published 2024
Watch this search
If you are familiar with RSS feeds, please click the button below to retrieve the feed URL:
RSS feed for this searchIf you are unfamiliar with RSS feeds, we would suggest reading this BBC article.
Unfortunately, due to the number of feeds we have available, we cannot provide e-mail updates. However, you could use tools such as Feed My Inbox to do this for you.
What are 'Individual studies' and 'Actions'?
Individual studies
An individual study is a summary of a specific scientific study, usually taken from a scientific journal, but also from other resources such as reports. It tells you the background context, the action(s) taken and their consequences.
If you want more detail please look at the original reference.
Actions
Each action page focuses on a particular action you could take to benefit wildlife or ecosystems.
It contains brief (150-200 word) descriptions of relevant studies (context, action(s) taken and their consequences) and one or more key messages.
Key messages show the extent and main conclusions of the available evidence. Using links within key messages, you can look at the paragraphs describing each study to get more detail. Each paragraph allows you to assess the quality of the evidence and how relevant it is to your situation.
Where we found no evidence, we have been unable to assess whether or not an intervention is effective or has any harmful impacts.